0:00
/
0:00

Paid episode

The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Proxy Earth

Vanishing Point: Section IV (eBook)

Zetetic Astronomy / An interactive eBook by Ira James Rogers (Part 4 of 5)
1

Previously:


Vanishing Point: Section I (eBook)

·
December 1, 2022
Vanishing Point: Section I (eBook)

Watch now (3 min) | This series also has an entire 3 part film I made for it. The entire thing is here.

Vanishing Point: Section II (eBook)

·
May 22, 2023
Vanishing Point: Section II (eBook)

Watch now (3 min) | Previously, on Vanishing Point: Preface Material Splinter ζητέω ζητέω Pt. I Philanthropy To retain context and make room for digestion, please read and watch the contents of Vanishing Point I before continuing further. This series also has an entire 3 part film I made for it. The entire thing is here.

Vanishing Point: Section III (eBook)

·
May 27, 2023
Vanishing Point: Section III (eBook)

Watch now (6 min) | Previously, on Vanishing Point; two sections:


You are now reading…

Vanishing Point: Section IV

Zetetic Astronomy

Dissolution of the Hyperreal


Note: What’s been determined so far is this: both the telescope and the microscope are tools in which their technological purposes can be inverted in order to protect the investments of materialist ideologues who seek to establish dominance over others. Societal consequences unfold and grow more rife upon philosophical stagnation, by crippling economics, masking over ethereal solutions, and insisting to the masses that they live in the inverse of a realm, built upon artificial scarcity.
We can begin by simply asking questions, and putting the power of optics and παρρησία back into the control of sovereign people without any need for the senselessly authoritative gatekeeping of scientism. Welcome to Zetetic Philosophy; incredibly daunting implications may ensue by means of questioning the official narrative.

Zetetic Astronomy

No matter the learned perspective of any reader, the following questions laced throughout this chapter should serve as a participatory method of expression and response in order to resolve and alleviate any argumentative tension stemmed from the Copernican Revolution and forward, as this model has been more and more accepted by the public since it’s appearance around 500 years ago. It has been generally accepted that the Copernican model of our Earth, Solar System, and Universe has been able to disprove it’s predating level and stationary Ptolemaic source in which the Earth is an extended plane, with a small and local Sun and Moon moving above it by the guiding sky clock that directly indicates our creation by intelligent design; in other words, this incites an origin of substance as opposed to our mere existence being sourced from nothingness. If the Copernican model be true, then the counter balancing of response to some of the following questions in this chapter should very easily and comfortably reveal which one of these models that we definitely do not exist on.

Above: The Ptolemaic System, with Earth at the center. Below: the Heliocentric model of the Solar System, and “Helical” relative to it’s relationship to the Milky Way galaxy + completely uninhabitable vacuum universe.

Aristotle wrote:

“Again, our observations of the stars make it evident not only that the Earth is circular, but also that it is a circle of no great size.”

With the non-ideological scientific method as a most useful tool in eliminating what is false for sake of achieving a more truthful taste in reality-based aesthetics, the burden for discernment still exists upon the very individuals reading along and participating, thus inviting subjective interpretation for what is measurably objective in our shared reality. The scientific method is specifically useful with disproving insistent hypotheses, thus rendering any truthful subject to analyze the existing remainder for themselves.

17th century occultist, Sir Francis Bacon wrote:

“Don’t theorize, but open your eyes and observe without prejudice, and you cannot doubt that the Sun moves and the Earth is at rest.”

The Copernican model makes and insists upon a claim, where the level and stationary model does not make claims for that which is unobservable. By question and observation, we return our philosophical thinking into one of free thought and open invitations for public discourse and response, regardless of anyone’s initial presupposition. Regarding what is objective, nature does not lie, people do.

In his 2019 book “Word Magic”, Pao Chang wrote:

“Phonetically, the term world sounds similar to the term whirled which is the past tense of the term whirl, meaning “to turn around, spin, or rotate rapidly”. Before you were born, you were whirled into existence. The evidence of this is the fact that your physical body is made of atoms. What do atoms do? They spin, vibrate, and rotate very rapidly…
…In English, the term whir is defined as ‘to go, fly, revolve, or otherwise move quickly with a humming or buzzing sound’. The definitions of the boldface(italicized) words in this paragraph are all related to the word spin. Why the word spin? Because everything in the universe spins to some degree and we live in a galaxy that spins. The world (“whirled”) also spins to a certain degree and the people living on it use spoken words to create their worlds and realities.”

What is testable, repeatable and observable is to directly see for oneself that Polaris, our North Star, does not move, and the stars above us show no parallax when spinning around Polaris in a counter-clockwise motion from the perspective of the viewer. However, one cannot prove that the Earth is moving from the Earth, and modern astronomers claim that all that is around us only gives us the illusion that we are at the center, rather than simply being at the center.

Parallax (noun)- the apparent displacement or the difference in apparent direction of an object as seen from two different points not on a straight line with the object

-Merriam-Webster Dictionary

The goal here is for those on any interpretive side of astronomy to build a more truthful argument in order to transparently share testable experiments, observations, and thus participate in the general dialogue that’s been surrounding this book and film. Anyone who seeks to disprove my work in order to continue supporting any alternative viewpoint is absolutely welcome to do so, and I encourage responses to many of the questions that occupy the remainder of this chapter.

Eric Dubay wrote:

“If the globe Earth was really spinning 1,000 mph, orbiting the Sun counter-clockwise at 67,000 mph, spiraling around the outer-arms of the Milky Way at 500,000 mph, while shooting through the Universe at 670,000,000 mph, how is it even conceptually possible that Polaris, 2 quadrillion miles away, day after day, year after year, always maintains its alignment straight above the North Pole!? That would mean from 2 quadrillion miles away, Polaris would have to be perfectly mirroring Earth’s several simultaneous wobbling, spinning, spiraling, and shooting motions. Polaris would have to be shooting the same direction through the Universe at exactly 670,000,000 mph; it would have to be following the same 500,000 mph, 225 million year spiral around the Milky Way, and mirroring the same 67,000 mph, 365 day orbit around our Sun! Or, the earth is stationary - as common sense and everyday experience testifies.”

The key motive here is not in stringently claiming to absolutely know everything about where we are, but it’s rather in exposing the insistent lie that has dominated public thought for the last 500 years of an elusive spell, hidden in plain sight. This has been equipping the collective ego with a generally subconscious acceptance, in which simulated proofs have been occluding access to one’s ability to harness energy from within the laws of nature at any high degree possible. It’s not a problem on our end that one may believe that we live on a whirling globe, nor is it a problem for one to believe that we are all living on the back of a macro-cosmic turtle turning circles in space, or some giant triangle. What has become a problem occurs whenever we’ve found entities, statesmen, corporations, scientists, astrophysicists, computer programmers, mathematicians, bankers, philanthropists, mainstream media personalities, alternative media and controlled opposition personalities, all tangentially working alongside one another to protect an investment in this 500 year old spell, thus actively censoring our side of the table and shadow-banning our researches and expositions apart from algorithms, publishing distribution and thus bookstores, and mainline social media outlets. The truth about our realm is being suppressed, and the evidence exists in simply analyzing the act of why there has been such a massive effort behind this scheme.

It is my observation that this form of censorship serves an ideologically inverse function to hide energy from the æther, more land and resources extending both North and South beyond the disclaimed world maps, and the evidence that we were simply created by intelligent design.

Proxy Earth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Share Proxy Earth

Watch with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Proxy Earth to watch this video and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.