This written work is a revelatory and scrupulous analysis with regard to a fair use film I wrote and edited, also called “Vanishing Point”.
You are now reading…
Vanishing Point: Section I
Ascension Prevention
Splinter
Experiments of False Experience
Philanthropy
Ascension Prevention
In context of measuring the Great Year of a ~26,000 year cycle, the next aeon of Aquarius is rapidly approaching to claim zodiacal dominion for a massive ~2000 year shift through the precession of the equinoxes. Extensively predating the 16th century emergence of Modern Science™, zodiac astrology was a measurably observable method in which to calculate the patterns of the cosmos above us, often in order to connect psychic phenomena of one’s microcosmic archetypal identity in directly sensible relationships through the macrocosm of cosmological pattern recognition. “As above, so below”, as a philosophical thought-form intuited souls to merely grasp at one’s own more centered significance in a geocentric universe.
A mass de-centering emerged, where stealthy problems arose during the scientific revolution of the 1500’s, riddling academics with hasty conclusions about an obtuse model of our world. Various occultists of this elusive illusion then universally imposed a diametrically inverse cosmological model, deemed by rationality, reason and logical deduction that the stars above us are to be materialistically unreachable. By calculating some of the most obscene measurements never to actually be performed, the great faithless disconnect from the cosmos was underway, masking such distanced believers into a dogmatic skepticism against the favor of our shared ethereal sky. In this most recent century, the alleged Moon landings flashed on the televisions of susceptible viewers, materializing this perfected circle of cosmic phenomena into being treated as some meaningless stone. The moon, stars, and all cosmic phenomena was then deemed only deserving of authoritatively truthful observation by appealing toward astrophysicist “experts” for explanations in what they are, and why we’re all here. A theological cocktail of evolution theory, traces its artificial sciences back to a big bang origin story, which so beget the ever-expanding model of our entire universe as an incalculable vacuum, effectuating the installation of a secret religion upon the masses. The advent of ideology itself barricades those hypnotized subjects from seeking within for a most obvious existence of the self-actualized soul, and prevent such necessary metaphysical ascension beyond the veil of reductionist materialism.
Long before the scientific revolution, it was well known that astrological phenomena and delicate patterns of the macrocosm above us could easily be measured using sundials, sextants, and compasses. For one example, it is possible to measure the precession of the equinoxes with utility of seeing no shadow on a sundial at high noon, located directly on the equator, which occurs during any spring equinox. In order to determine which constellation that specific day over time could be measured per the pattern recognition of the sun’s occupancy on the zodiac sky clock, the zero-shadowed sundial shall point to the direct opposite side of the zodiac, exactly 12 hours later, during night-time. For example, the opposite of Libra would be Aries, and so on. Meanwhile, it’s become completely taboo for any philosopher to criticize Modern Science™ as a secret religion at all, for sake of receiving outrageous amounts of ridicule from among those representing the scientific community.
Stepping into the next aeon suggests an inevitably cathartic adjustment to our collective psyche en masse, and it calls for removing the ball and chains that still inhibit ultra-conscious visions into the realms that exist beyond material science. The disruption of progress exists in distracting the self with xeroxes of infotainment which follows the protocols of self-surveillant and authoritatively censorious omissions of modern academic philosophy, leaving only empty space in the wake of that which remains generally unspoken. False breakthroughs of Modern Science™ continue to spin webs of narrative insanity, and tame the public’s attention toward accepting a completely rotten cosmological model, which hinges upon a narrative of heavily accepted academic claims about evolution, climate change, fossil fuels, nuclear power, the “big bang” origin story, or doomsday black holes allegedly found in this simulacrum of false nature. The weaponization of emotion-draining articles and psychotic video manipulation performed by mass media with regard to treacherous official narratives of history is undergoing a process where we are unveiling it all. It’s clearly produced a dangerously fraudulent hyperreality to mask over where we exist in this dimension of our shared reality, thus leaving those frustrated and short of time to remain stagnant and unmoved from what binds them without necessity. These insane narratives have generated an insufficient quality of life for a society that has operated under the hypnosis of a multi-generational conspiratorial spell. The purpose of this written work exists to break the spell for any reader who chooses to engage with it, and to reveal what physical barriers seem to actually prevent the ascension of phallic government rockets from going anywhere beyond our sky. Many of us have heard such a casual catch phrase that may resonate, “the sky is the limit”.
With intent to metaphysically contextualize discoveries and philosophical concerns, my craft of reverse hypnosis is written with a conscious effort to slice open the bag and reveal the raw contents that have been hidden beneath such a treacherous foundation which holds up the system itself. Secret societies, state intelligence operators, and cultish traitors who have been collectively working against the civilian class operate to keep as many people rendered maximally confused as possible in order to take advantage of them. Those complicit in going along with this narrative have inherited a reductionist scam, and most of these constituents have chosen to maintain their investments in such inverted sorcery that serves no benefit to our society and cultures whatsoever. This setting described necessitates critique and reexamination from someone outside of the academic echo chambers, such as myself.
The contents ahead will lay out a firm argument about how this officiated sorcery has been taken too far, as it’s manipulated human generations into being grafted by a salesman’s scam of unconscionable proportions. Vanishing Point is crafted with the intent of serving a payoff for perspective curiosity, and to provide a macrocosm of relief for those who are seeking to reduce complexity for their own lives. These works function to expose the authoritative wash that’s been needlessly grafting the masses by the iconic utility of sanctimoniously-charged inverse world systems. Thieving pirates now artistically don the costume of expert scientists by weaponizing insufficient explanations about our shared reality. The public often appeals authority over to unreadable books written by Stephen Hawking’s wheelchair in order to torture more susceptible and awe-inspired readers into accepting trash narratives about gravity or black holes, thus generating a nihilistic worship of nothing with the help of this mute messiah. Students of false realms are lured into soul traps, who’ve allowed their dreams to be played with, like white rabbits investing money to academia, only to find themselves chasing carrots into caves of further nothingness.
Precise astrophysical mathematics agree with themselves as scam artist professors weaponize otherworldly chalkboard equations and overwhelm students with soul devouring floods of unreadable spreadsheets in order to shift the line of scrimmage for applied physics to further delve into realms governed by software. Digital simulacrums reverse engineer the reality construct around us, and effectively renders code used for continuously creating protocols for the matrix itself. The collective shares a reality which remains increasingly damaged by these ideologically charged narratives for so long as incomprehensible mathematical confusion and hired guns are paid off to buffer the public with meticulous hypnoses of flaccid damage control. The mainstream persistence of psychic illusion maintenance seems complicit in protecting philanthropic investments. Expert personalities of ontological modern science create further confusion for attentive academics, by concluding theories based on theories without experiment. Masking over the thin ice of massive top-down money laundering schemes are the dancing shadow puppet professors who regurgitate whatever curriculums were taught to them before. At its ideological core foundation, the scheme of this secret religion continues to siphon unspeakable amounts of money from common people, which in consequence generates absolute poverty for civilians to experience, without ever knowing why. Through the agreement rituals of tacit consent, populations have been automatically taxed through income, and thus unknowingly subsist a most spiritually destructive economic stagnation. Severe whiplash may occur for those who have been drowning inside this hypnotic spell that’s been crafted by the stealthily promoted totalitarian ideologies that were convincingly sold to gullible past generations by the cruelest wizardry of Modern Science™ during the course of the past 500 years.
While reading this, I suggest one to extract value and make room for detail and digestion, for facing this material may make any of you feel like someone who is afraid of elevators, deciding to board an elevator upon their own volition, beyond the confines of any initial egoistic apprehension. Proceed as you please, but by all means if you prefer instead to take the stairs, just don’t read any of this and stay satisfied with the status quo of being openly lied to by the pirates who siphon away your money without reason. The scam artists behind such unconscionable lies have conned most of the public into paying taxes in order to merely exist. The economic destruction of free time, and the occlusion of wealth normalizes an all-too-trusting public into the duress of abject poverty. For the ones who would like to take the stairs, continue to enjoy your weird and unfounded received beliefs that satiate the impulses of one’s own ego. Maintain one’s absence of creativity, protect your investments in the system that enslaves you, and be sure not to read any more of this book if you prefer to stay satisfied with watching high pressure sales ads of TV specials that have openly insisted to you that you are whirling in motion through a vacuum. Stay stubbornly satisfied that a bunch of cultist men actually played golf on the moon, and be sure not to observe the skies at all, for thousands upon thousands of completely dedicated and hard-working scientists can just look at the skies for you.
For those independently proceeding forward with my works, know that there is no turning back from the disillusionment that may unfold, for the analysis of this chess game we exist in is quite an elaborate one. Vanishing Point is a series for the unseen ones who have chosen to take the elevator, in an honest pursuit of cold truth, without being confined to the annuls of Modern Science™.
“When we speak of man, we have a conception of humanity as a whole, and before applying scientific methods to the investigation of his movement we must accept this as a physical fact. But can anyone doubt today that all the millions of individuals and all the innumerable types and characters constitute an entity, a unit? Though free to think and act, we are held together, like the stars in the firmament, with ties inseparable. These ties cannot be seen, but we can feel them. I cut myself in the finger, and it pains me: this finger is a part of me. I see a friend hurt, and it hurts me, too: my friend and I are one. And now I see stricken down an enemy, a lump of matter which, of all the lumps of matter in the universe, I care least for, and it still grieves me. Does this not prove that each of us is only part of a whole?”
—Nikola Tesla: The Problem of Increasing Human Energy with Special References to the Harnessing of the Sun’s Energy (June 1900)
Splinter
A freshly paved asphalt parking lot paints itself around another unmemorable camouflaged cube hidden in plain sight by a nameless highway exit during rush hour traffic commutes; most never ask what this is, nor care. Each morning upon entry, automatic doors hiss open after a ding sound green-lights permission by way of an aesthetically placed futuristic badge scanner, approving entry for ID-tagged experts who have been routinely arriving to work. Rapid oscillations of fluorescent lighting flickers in long hallways that snakes along the fulfilled blueprint interior of a climate-controlled metatronic grid of this stark and brutalist corporate efficiency. Constituents are heavily rewarded salaried paychecks that have been passively grafted by the relentless acts of taxation siphoned out from the general public, a step apart from watching lunch money fall out of the loose pockets of an upside down child, hoisted above playground mulch by a greedy 8th grader. Age differences render the small robbery into a clean success for the perpetual bully, as superior upper body strength awards him more pathologically justified means of economic survival against this robbed child. Laboratory rooms are laced with indescribably expensive pieces of hyper-sophisticated science equipment, all decisively sectioned off for the various working minds who have been tactfully walled up into their respective specialty fields; what these specialists all have in common is they were bent to a degree by academic institutions, thus forcing these piece of paper wielding scientists to stay in their lanes without any cross contamination of ideas among others who exist just down the hallway.
White collar marionettes gain vetted access to this materialist environment in order to stringently work inside of this cold-walled church of performative machine worship in order to silently sing the hymns of digitized and artificial experiments within the societal control groups of mysteriously and authoritatively peer-reviewed realms of indescribable isolation. Misuses of witchcraft unfold as a dead philosophy with applied ideas that surround the experimentally-absent-science of soulless corporations. This twisting of the method then crafts itself into an actuated secret religion that hides in plain sight off some highway, where vetted employees are heavily paid off by the delicate techniques of income tax automation. Public trust is on autopilot beyond the realms of consent to payment, as this scheme sieves dividends to a most meticulous cult of scientists, unconsciously synchronized for sake of protecting that which remains unspoken.
A subconscious exploration of a scientist echoes to itself:
“Today was another day of working hard, sorting documents and conducting various experiments at the laboratory.”
“You see, the world rests on the shoulders of hard working scientists in their respective specialty fields in order to make sure the world that we live on indeed continues to properly rotate and revolve amidst the wake and riptide of gravitational pull by a constantly outward moving star that we call the Sun. It is important for us to empirically construct computer simulations of these massive phenomena so that we can calculate the probability of catastrophic astronomical circumstances. With our work, we can stay ahead of nature and provide a safety net for the survival of the human race, as we shift closer and closer toward a Type 1 civilization.”
“Various threats to humanity must be solved inside of sterile laboratory settings in order to help prevent future viral outbreaks of pathogenic disease.”
“Worldwide catastrophes could come in the form of any invasive species that could suddenly arrive here from the vast unknown, whether they be microbiological or if we need to precisely nuke an asteroid into oblivion before it is to come crashing down onto us. We can prevent this.”
“The dinosaurs did not have science on their side, because they could not conduct science like we can today, so it is obvious that they took no precaution towards inventing nuclear weapons in order to fight their own asteroid that led to the demise of their species… We now know that that the bones of dinosaurs still continue to be radioactive from an invasive asteroid that completely wiped them out into extinction. Best not to touch the bones.”
“I don’t expect anyone who is not a scientist, a virologist, an astrophysicist or a paleontologist to understand the importance of what we could be dealing with here. Why bother with those who do not know what they’re talking about?”
“Right now, we are dealing with global warming, and if science is not to innovate quickly enough, or if we were to somehow lose our government funding, we could be looking at the extinction of mankind.”
“Innovation, medicine, genetic sequencing, computer models, chemistry, man walking on the moon, and so on… All of this is how we can ensure that science continues to allow our world to exist in a stable state of homeostasis as it makes another lap around the sun this year.”
“This week, a full sequence of computer code were placed together in order to help simulate another complex experiment, but the numbers are lining up perfectly to our hypothesis.”
“The amount of science that’s been done inside of this room is truly incomprehensible to the average person. It’s not really worth explaining to someone, as it would be very similar to a scientist speaking directly to a lab rat. I mean, take a look at some of the things we like to work on.”
“It’s time to punch out for the day, hit the pub and just loosen up a little. Just a quick couple of brews on my way home after all this important work we’ve been doing. After all, I deserve it.”
To The Pub…
It’s a dimly lit room with a vintage ambience and the sound of bar glasses being washed, with the creaking sound of wooden floors being paced upon. Cordial conversations are sporadically hyperbolic and audibly animate with light bursts of chatter, while what’s observed is assorted dark burgundy furniture, green velvet siding on the walls. The glow of soft lamps illuminate the commons, laced with wooden tabletops of leisurely chess matches. At one table, two men arrange pieces to set up for a new game. The white pieces are set to a smiling gentleman who is surrounded by friends and acquaintances. Ambivalent upon arrival, the man playing the black pieces just got off a busy day of work at a laboratory. A Rolex watch implies to the others that he sits well with money, and it’s known that he gets paid to do extensive research projects. He likes to come out to this bar to straighten out his Rolex watch and be seen in this aesthetic environment.
The gentleman playing the white pieces opens with pawn to e4, which is a common, but strong opening. As pawn e5 returns from the off duty scientist playing the black pieces, the penumbra around the table becomes a humorous conversation directing a collective focus towards a hardback National Geographic book sitting on a shelf nearby.
The entire night has been a series of clashing glasses and laughter. Observably, one sees an image and reacts to it based on lived experiences, and varying degrees of exposition.
White bishop to c4 as white inquires to the ones near the table, “Dude, get a load of this. So have y’all actually seen the Apollo 17 lunar liftoff? Who was the guy that was left behind on the moon who would pan the camera up as a means to capture the entire liftoff?” A nearby patron overhears and cups two hands over his mouth and provides a goofy impression, “PCHKKKT PCHKKKT; we’re on our way, Houston!” His friends all laugh hysterically about it, while the scientist grows disturbingly uncomfortable.
Black plays pawn to d5, threatening pawn e4 and the bishop on c4, while writhing around a bit, not laughing, and not playing along with the snowball of humor that is clearly avalanching inside of his mind: “It is my scientific duty to defend what is so extremely obvious, because these stupid peasants cannot degrade one of mankind’s greatest achievements. I know there are satellites in orbit, and I know for a fact that we landed on the moon. It has all been proven already.”
White’s pawn takes on d5, mirrored by a quick response of knight f6 from black. As pawn d3 comes out, white inquires to the scientist playing black, “Well pal, what do you think is really going on?" Black plays bishop c5, white knight to f3, and then black castles kingside, while murmuring to white and his friends, “What do I think, eh? I think that you all just don’t know what the fuck you’re talking about.”
White plays bishop g5, pinning the knight to the queen, as white attempts to revive the vibes of the evening, while creating a peace offering out of one of the books in his bag: “Well pal, go check out the Apollo 17 liftoff later for yourself because this is what my friends and I have been talking about this week! The claims are ridiculous, and the footage is hilarious, we can’t stop watching this shit show unfold! Maybe you just haven’t seen the footage more closely, but it might be wise to check it out and see if it makes any sense to you.”
Black responds with a hasty pawn h6, threatening white’s dark-square bishop, and states, “Of course it makes fucking sense, and I don’t need to look at shit to prove that we went to the moon. I am a hard working scientist, and I already know we went to the moon, and we are going to go again. Science is something that can be trusted, verified, and proven right.” Leaning in, shoulders forward, “You see, I would know, I have a degree where I spent years of my life studying these things. Things you wouldn’t understand, considering you probably do not have a degree in empirical science. Carry on and keep splitting hairs with your fickle unscientific bullshit.” Bishop takes on h6, where black responds by pawn taking white’s bishop on h6, opening up a hole in the pawn structure, for white to attack the king.
White to h3, accelerating development, and the introduction of the first chapter of the book is being read aloud, with the most sophisticated opponent scratching at the inside of black’s mind with a prying splinter: “The longer you listen, the sweeter the pitch. Don’t let them fool you.”
Nearby, the gentleman playing white spills the guts of the claims by showing the claims for everyone to see.
Black responds with an infuriating black bishop taking the pawn on h3. A clear blunder. White takes bishop with rook on h3, and continues splaying out clippings onto the table.
Black is making guesses at this point, dark bishop takes pawn on f2, check. White king takes bishop on f2, while a friend opened up the National Geographic book, and lays it out on a nearby table: “Behold, the final frontier!”… and the gentlemen laugh.
Black responds with knight g4, check, and white’s king retreats, while black wastes a move with pawn c6. Black’s backrank is gridlocked and constricted by its own design. Three pawns imprison an underdeveloped knight and a constricted rook: “That photo you are showing should be absolutely stunning evidence to show to anyone out there the curvature of the Earth, and what objectively happens whenever floating around in the vacuum of space. What are you guys going to do next, go all out with the ‘fake moon landing’ angle of bullshit, or what?! Always the same shit with you people, and there’s actually no point in anyone debating you.”
White’s knight takes pawn h6, check forcing the black king to move closer to the knight, but also an alternative option for a narrow escape outside his one remaining pawn.
White rook checks black king from g3, black takes white’s knight sacrifice on h6. The magazine continues unfolding by a friend nearby speaking and emphasizing contentious parts of dialogue with heavy hitting sarcasm: “Get a load of this, dude. This is further irrefutable evidence that these people have for sure been to space. Why would they lie about landing on the moon? So what, NASA lost the information, technology and coordinates for landing on the moon, these things totally just happen, am I right? I mean look at these pictures! The science is freakin’ settled, my guy. These pictures could never be faked!” The aches of authentic laughter grows out of control but the splinter grows deeper for the scientist who spent all day at work.
That inner voice talks to black, “Don’t let them play head games with you, they’re all doing this to throw your game. They’re a part of this game, and they’re in on it. Trying to undermine you in front of everyone else. Remember that this enemy is an external one. They’re the reason you’re trapped here playing this silly, meaningless game. Does this game even matter? All of what’s become will eventually evaporate in the heat of a supernova, and history erased by a solar flare thanks to the jokes these enemies make of themselves. They all spew disinformation from untrustworthy sources to one another, and it’s all a massive con to undermine your life’s work. What if other people catch on to what they’re saying? That must be stopped, because the fragile future of humanity rests on this very moment. Stand up for the future, you can be the one. Do it. It’s time to draw attention away from them, and reclaim it immediately. Your life depends on it. Your career, and all the time you spent. How else could you be remembered for your remarkable works one day? You won’t gain the chance if you don’t act now. Take action, and protect your investment.”
Black stands up furiously, flips the table over, and with it, the entire chessboard is hurled violently in the air. Pieces fly all around, and generate clattering sounds of entropy onto the hardwood floor. The game completely de-materializes as if none of the moves ever mattered whatsoever. The scientist will do anything to remove this splinter from his mind. A disgraceful projection ensues, “Get out of my head, fool. There’s no time for mind games. Get the hell out of my head, you don’t know shit about fuck,” while swatting at thin air like a disgraceful child having his ball taken away. The crowd surrounding the bar, all become immediately disinterested in the games played, perspiring beverages, or any of the jokes or stories told to one another. The situation shifts their collective attention toward the splinter-brained scientist who is now throwing chess pieces around in an emptied room.
From this lamplit room of former pleasantries, the story to be told of this night will be remembered in gossip about black’s erratic behavior amidst a peaceful setting of enjoyable drinks and some jovial games of chess: “There is no point to this game. There is no point in me being here. One day we will all become stardust, or get sucked into a black hole. We shall go the way of the dinosaur when the next meteor hits us. There is no time for debating this issue any further! The science IS IN FACT settled. Fucking I AM a scientist, and you will RESPECT ME! Do you know how many YEARS I put into this? I will not contend with your MIND GAMES. You didn’t put in the TIME and HOURS I did in order to know what I know.”
Years, indeed.
“Eventually, when the opponent is challenged or questioned… Means the victim’s investment, and thus his intelligence is questioned.
No one can accept that… Not even to themselves.”
And you… Yes, I’m talking to you! As you read this… Were you somehow wondering how you could possibly connect with or even resonate with the meandering novelized exposition of my written out chess moves between these unnamed characters? Without the visual assistance of a chessboard, video of the chessboard, or any metaphorical visual queues to help assist the points being made about them, where is the most truthful tension to be felt? It’s arguably absent, however this is a brief metaphor for the state of conversations surrounding these scientific topics today, for the dominating ideas of the 20th century are being conquered and rendered obsolete by comedic intuition. The men in this chapter have no names nor a backstory, for they are mostly a “Black” and a “White”, representing the dualistic checkerboard pattern that performs pendulum swinging opposite motions of dialectical tension upon the fictional players at the bar.
The game would otherwise be so tense if it was amplified with artistic value, videography, sound design, except the text of its moves aren’t tense at all due to its lack of facility. The chess moves have been reduced to words, which acts as a gatekeeper for nearly anyone, with exception given to elite chess grandmasters equipped with photographic memories, who have been trained to play chess blindfolded. Most people do not fall into this category, obscuring the tension of the chess game apart from the general public who may be reading along.
This is a metaphorical exercise for gatekeeping and smoke-screening what’s measurably objective and lowering its resolution into something ambiguously frustrating to decipher.
The game has already dematerialized all over the floor, and you might be wondering why you’ve been brought here to read something like this… By throwing the chess pieces around, was that a forfeit? Does it all read kind of like a densely worded peer-reviewed science paper, that for some unspoken reason, fails to display its purported experiment and fails to be transparent of its contents by endlessly berating the reader with a completely indigestible language?
It will list out some materialist word salad in an authoritatively rhetorical fashion and arrogantly expect you to keep up. But as you were reading the chess moves in this chapter, ask yourself if you somehow had the entire chess board envisioned in your head. You didn’t. But as you were reading, did you pull out a chess board yourself, and try the moves out for yourself, to see if you could connect to the material a little better? Or did you want to find faults in the layout, to find out if the moves being made in the paragraphs were breaking the rules of chess?
You didn’t. So, here we are.
During a Science Friday interview aired on National Public Radio, filmmaker Werner Herzog stated:
“Our place in the universe… Well, it is here, and that's the place we have, and nothing else; everything else is unfriendly. We cannot flee from our planet, I mean, go to any other planet in the solar system; it's just not inviting. The next star out there is only four and a half light years away, but with the fastest speed we can ever reach… So far, it would take a hundred and ten thousand years just to go there. Hundreds and hundreds of generations, they wouldn't even know where they were going. There would be incest and madness and murder and whatever en route… So, it's not pleasant to move.”
Experiments of False Experience
ζητέω (zētéō) – properly, to seek by inquiring; to investigate to reach a binding (terminal) resolution; to search, "getting to the bottom of a matter."
It is often that the scientific method can be used to diagnose problems and solve them, and those who properly employ it with simplicity are more apt to transparently prove or disprove any properly conducted experiment toward attentive listeners. If the experiment is testable, repeatable and observable, the public trust with regard to such an experiment can be positively amplified from within our shared reality, and even more so if the repeatability of it is affordably accessible to those who may come from outside the respective specialty fields, in order to extract value for themselves.
An ethical philosophical grounding can be a key component in applying guidance to the subjective mind of any scientist, for this social responsibility involves truthful transparency of the method, and shouldn’t fear investigation or questioning. Any ethically charged individual should ideally use the scientific method without bending the experiment, if it is to be a true science. Without the application for this standard of ethics or scientific discernment, parasitic scam artists shall inevitably emerge, producing minor to major consequences while working against the favor of susceptible individuals. Ideologically motivated pseudo-science causes immeasurable problems, and inevitably casts a broad negative effect upon the shared reality of entire civilizations. A more philosophical society allows space for inquiry by allowing subjective discourses and inviting expositional resolution in order to facilitate the achievement of any given objective. In contrast, a more ideologically motivated or totalitarian society tends to willfully ignore or egoistically engage in censorship in order to preserve the image of authority. Authentic individuals are eager to shift hypotheses by allowing any natural phenomenon the opportunity to speak for itself. For any scientist to truthfully communicate those results is mostly useful, however it is due to the opportunities of economic vampirism that scientific corruption exists not too far below the fragile thin ice of the scientific ideal. Skewed experiments are often designed to distort experience by unconsciously de-centering trustees into pervasive forms of psychically destructive hypnotism.
Like a hammer or a box cutter, computer systems are also tools that can be used for building or destroying things, depending upon the extrapolated application of the one interacting with it. More ethical scientists should refrain from the excessive uses of result manipulation from within the interfaces of ever-evolving software, for it holds the potential of becoming a psychically destructive art-form. With moderation, software can still be a useful tool for assisting data collection and measurement, and shouldn’t be completely avoided. The involvement of black mirrored devices would require individuated discernment, thus rendering results into the realms of subjective interpretation and cognitive bias; some see a photo where others who look deeper may counter-claim the photo to be a wizard’s cartoon.
Pseudo-scientific normalizations are often found in the animated presentations of evidences within software or in the proselytizing of chaotic conclusions of nuclear scientists who can be found filming controlled demolitions on realistic looking toy sets from inside some filmmaker’s garage; this scam produces fear-mongering negative effects on eagerly duped observers. While having preprogrammed the public for decades with false doomsday scenarios, rotten politicians are itching to play nuke volleyball war games against foreign adversaries, where both sides of the artificial conflict are weaponizing mushroom cloud imagery. Then arose a nightmarish hyperreality strategically beamed straight into the minds of Cold War generations of people who were all stuck watching low-resolution television sets without rewind buttons, effectively reducing pragmatic skepticism.
The vile rhetoric surrounding these existentially dreadful stunts darkly pivoted the chaotic simulacrum of these artistic renditions into accepting a more restorative order of tighter economic squeezes for civilian life led astray by this mentally enslaving spell. In order to generate subtle increases of income-taxable forms of deliberate punch-down economic sorcery, the gone-in-a-flash hostage situation of nuclear scares would simulate justifications for the very existence of taxation itself, directly benefiting any co-opting superpower involved. By the uses of exaggerated smoke and mirrors through controlled multi-kiloton TNT demolition test explosions, lying statesmen directly threaten their own people by artificially insisting that a grand total of one particular device that is about the size of a briefcase or a car holds the destructive potential be dumped out of the back of an airplane and indiscriminately obliterate the existence of all life and matter within it’s blast radius. However, if this indiscriminately destructive atomic weapon indeed existed and cleared the city of Hiroshima from its blast radius, then how is it that can we find interviews with survivors? Considering the absence of aerial photography proving a circular blast radius over the targets, the entire situation can only possibly make sense if the city was strategically firebombed. The same applies to Nagasaki, Japan.
Volatile bluffs of elaborate illusion magic is of absolute benefit to con artists. For example: a poker player holding a 2 of clubs and a 7 of hearts has absolutely nothing matching on the table, but bravely drops a larger than usual stack of chips for the river card. The river now displays a third spade on the table, tricking the active players into believing the raise may represent an unbeatable flush. Holding a pair that would otherwise win the round, the opposing player fears the possible outcome, and capitulates. He folds his cards while the bluffing poker player collects the pot without having to ever reveal his cards.
This metaphor is applicable to the hyperreality of false nuclear weapon scenarios, if only one would simply ask better questions. How did the video camera, the sound equipment, and all captured footage manage to survive from so close within the blast radius while houses were blown apart?
When I was a kid, I used to collect Star Wars Ep. I Pepsi cans, and eventually by the time Star Wars Ep. II came out, I found that the weather humidity actually caused my cans of collectible soda to explode on the shelf while I was away at school. But if even some of these nuclear weapons are real, then how is it that when North Korea’s military authoritatively wheels out live nuclear weapons onto hot pavement directly in front of the leader and thousands of witnessing civilians, the stunt goes off without any problems, with one very clear example being an existentially destructive radioactive explosion underneath the hot sun? What if an axle breaks and one of these nukes accidentally go off? What if it’s too humid outside? Could it be that these phallic rockets are just pieces of military art?
The violent Cold War nuke explosion imagery was briefly flashed into minds of public school students via television announcements and daunting official radio broadcasts, which tricked them into darker realms of receiving coercive instructions from statist propaganda films about how to survive the extinction event threats. Bullshitting red telephones rested on the desks of traitorous political leaders in order to play fake war games of artificial nuclear volleyball. School prisoner students were coerced into regularly repeating these needlessly traumatizing drills of what produced undeserved hopelessness via the artificial futility of ridiculously staged duck and cover operations. Intoxicating imagery of the nuclear hoax was flash-permeated into the fragile memories of susceptible children, so to have them accept a higher power in total nihilism for the inverse function of a mass de-centering.
The existence of nuclear weapons is a positive claim made by world superpowers, but the false imagery errs heavily toward their non-existence.
Improvisational actors don the white-collared costumes of Modern Science™ while being briefly interviewed on condescending television channels. These philanthropy-funded parasites can be found littering cartoon-fueled trash all over the textbooks and newspapers of the scientific realm. By use of fake software evidences, which permeate obnoxious fire-hoops for solving false problems among the psychic realm, the susceptible public grows terrified beyond necessity, and thus capitulates to the spell being cast on tell-a-vision. False solutions arise to solve false problems, which often benefit the cults who perpetuate ghastly hoaxes in order to vampirically benefit from the dialectical issue at hand. With a proper fear ritual surrounding false evidence, those who benefit from selling products that ameliorate initial scientific fears are often found to congruently be the very same philanthropists who directly funded the very same pseudo-scientific experiments that generated such distorted simulacrums of false issues, which is hermetically crafted into real life consequences, intentionally cast upon our shared reality.
“Six feet. Stay at home. Save lives. Wash your hands. Wear a mask. 15 days to slow the spread. It’s proven safe and effective. Children can have heart attacks too. Peer reviewed data cannot lie.”
In other words: A sinister snake oil salesman directly benefits by falsely offering to cure (placebo*) something that doesn’t actually exist (nocebo*), by gaslighting the fearful customer into tacit consent for agreement upon that which doesn’t actually exist (nocebo), when it’s merely the fear itself that has been making them sick. By urgently simulating the necessity for the extraordinarily profitable snake oil (placebo that does nothing), the salesman can manipulate the very emotions of the fearful client by introducing such a fake solution to what would otherwise be a non-existent problem.
Definitions from Oxford Languages:
*placebo- (noun)
a harmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect.
"his Aunt Beatrice had been kept alive on sympathy and placebos for thirty years"
a substance that has no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing new drugs.
a measure designed merely to calm or please someone.
"pacified by the placebos of the previous year, they claimed a moral victory"
*nocebo- (noun)
a detrimental effect on health produced by psychological or psychosomatic factors such as negative expectations of treatment or prognosis.
Modern claims made about the scientific method arise from asking a simple question into the technocracy’s search engine. In plain writing from the top of a corporatized algorithm, highly ideological pseudo-scientific agendas receive excuses to exist, which bends the scientific method itself, xeroxing the academic field of science into an egoistic circus.
Sciencebuddies.com writes:
Skewed apart from its methodology, it is clear that much of what we perceive to be conclusive scientific evidence skips the experiment altogether, as can be seen in the first sentence of the major paragraph:
“Do all scientists follow the scientific method exactly? No. Some areas of science can be more easily tested than others. For example, scientists studying how stars change as they age or how dinosaurs digested their food cannot fast-forward a star’s life by a million years or run medical exams on feeding dinosaurs to test their hypotheses.”
The problem reveals itself with clues laced out in the words themselves, where we hear talk of “scientific theory” as opposed to “conclusion” or “experiment”. In order to unravel nefarious motives which produce pseudo-scientific trash, what necessitates questioning are the ideological presuppositions lurking in the conspiratorial minds of benefactors who wave flags for a broadly-accepted Modern Science™. Artificial science substitutes mere insistence and deadened empty space in place of experiment. Without any substance to experiment, that absence itself is what is due for questioning. The reliance upon computer models, trusting experts in respective specialty fields, and overriding ones own ability to test these experiments for themselves is exactly what shifts the fields of science into the territories of pseudoscience, or scientism. When a popular astrophysicist such as Neil DeGrasse Tyson is openly insisting that the 5 senses (sight, smell, taste, touch, hearing) are not useful data collectors for one to conduct science for themselves, we must begin to ask what it is he could be helping hide from our 5 senses.
During a lecture, astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said:
“One of the lowest forms of evidence is eyewitness testimony. Which is odd because it’s one of the highest forms of evidence in the court of law, which disturbs me greatly.
If you come from a lab to a science conference and say, ‘This is true’…
…We say, ‘How do you know this?’
‘Because I saw it.’
That’s really the end of your talk, and you just leave…
And then we say, ‘Come back when you have a chart recorder, to just give me something that does not have to flow through your senses.’
…Because your senses is some of the worst data-taking devices that exist, and science did not achieve maturity until we had instruments that either extended our senses or replaced them.”
Someone saying “because I saw it” usually veers forward into the realms of someone using video recording devices, and trying to provide more scrupulous evidence to support their case with total transparency. Perhaps the person saw it and also gathered a recording of it with a handy video camera. This could easily replicate the two senses of sight and sound, something of which chart recorders themselves cannot ever make a proper substitution for. Security cameras can be used to identify and catch criminals, and video recordings can help find the truth of a crime, while chart recorders may detect cultural patterns in order to manipulate trends with control groups. All possibilities of getting closer to the truth is quickly shooed away and conveniently overlooked by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who has openly claimed that he refuses to ever debate anyone who disagrees with his chosen cosmological model, of which is visually presented by the clever *animators of his sanctimoniously Scientific™ and philanthropically-funded cartoon show, “Cosmos”.
During his “Negation of the Real” speech, author James Lindsay stated:
“It’s called ‘negating the real’
…we need to obliterate reality if we're going to substitute in a fake. There's no other way to get people to accept a fake reality; you have the power of your own senses. What do we always say when we want to point out a totalitarian thing?
‘Don't believe your lying eyes’
‘Don't believe your lying ears’
‘Don't believe your own senses.’
Your senses actually allow you to contact truth.
If you're a Christian, you believe the law is written on your heart; it allows you to contact truth.
Theyhave to obliterate that.
Theyhave to negate your access to the real in order to substitute the hyperreal in its place.Theycan't give you the artificial unless they get rid of the actual for you, and that's very important to understand.”
Any entirely subjective hallucinatory experience traverses into levels far beyond the ceilings of empirical science, rendering the scientific method itself arguably insufficient to substitute in place for more metaphysical traditions, which hinge more heavily upon a balanced mix of divine intuition and spiritually-charged conversations. Upon having integrated the psychic shadow, open-minded souls may have the opportunity to enter into ascendant mental states. By way of abandoning the five senses, a soul can thus in trade gain itself deeper accesses into the subconscious mind, which exists in dream-like realms. A metaphorical knob-turning of psychic frequency occurs within the transcendent mental realms, as it patiently awaits beyond words and thoughts. For failing to ever ask better questions, atheistic empiricists deny themselves access to these spiritual realms, for sake of fictionalizing the fifth element of aether, and worshiping the fact-checkers who refuse observe the magical entertainer who learned how to pull rabbits out of hats.
Masterful practitioners may find trigger points in sobriety, whereas many rely upon the assistance of burning spirits, vast arrays of alchemical potions, or psilocybin foods to ease the process. In a de-centered vulnerability emerges, and the mind of the subject enters into a more supernatural flow-state. When properly managed by any well-guarded practitioner, this state of consciousness can be useful for explorations that go above and beyond the material state of existence.
The mage Draja Mickaharic wrote:
“Our shared perception of the physical universe by our sensory organs is all that we really have in common with our fellow human beings. Most of us eventually recognize that many of our perceptions, and the experiences resulting from these perceptions, are so unique to us that we cannot really share them with others.
While a majority can agree on observations such as dimension (length, height, breadth), color, and sound, our standards of odor and taste have a great variability, and this makes any observations of these physical senses quite subjective. The more subtle senses— the psychic perceptions— show even greater ranges of variability. Many people seem to be blind, deaf, and dumb to these phenomena, while others have psychic senses as open to these non-physical perceptions as their physical senses are open to physical perceptions.”
Frequently, the more restrictive beliefs of reductionist academics tend to be existentially nihilistic and egoistically impenetrable. Seemingly disabled from unlearning mental trash, spellbound students often mimic general agreement with the heavily-ingrained false knowledge borrowed from spellbound professors, for sake of protecting such a vastly time-consuming investment. Great numbers of people accept the material status quo and go about their daily lives without knowledgeable preparation or spiritual protection ritual, rendering them susceptible toward the will of authoritarian control, and rendering their life-force into low vibrational states of ripe food for seemingly otherworldly energy vampires. Without having ever experienced psychoanalytical shadow work, one could find nothing to worship in a higher power except for the simulated flames of an asteroid that will never arrive. Mentally de-centered subjects may then become malleable avatars for psychical manipulation by the spell-casting of a more nefarious hypnotist or ideologically-possessed being. The top-down academic hubris of materialistic totalitarian sorcery, serves to rigidly enforce reductionist visions, enslaving minds into more restrictive modes of false experience actively disarms the five senses of an attentive audience, where we find Neil DeGrasse Tyson as the possessor weaponizing a retrogressive exchange en masse to a heavily susceptible population amidst the simulacrum of a televised throne of Modern Science™. The audience experiences a delusional dream-state of soul-lure system cartoons, and aspiring astrophysicists susceptibly take his word for it.
Draja Mickaharic wrote:
Both modern and ancient investigations of the manner of perception, and the operation of the human sensory system, reveal that the physical senses and their interpretation are ultimately subjective. They are particular to the individual, rather than objective, and can not always be agreed on by the community. Anthropological research has indicated that physical perception by our sensory organs may be culturally subjective as well, and really not uniform through the human family as a whole. For the majority of humanity, the perceptions of the non-measurable physical, as well as the non-physical senses, are entirely subjective. These perceptions are based upon references which the individual does not share with family or community.
When we classify various modes of magical practice, it will necessarily be subjective and will relate to individual perceptions. The practice of magic is seldom objective, and is seldom examined objectively by the community. The practice of magic is usually a subjective and personal experience.
Magic will never become a science because it is not measurable, nor can it be precisely replicated. These are the two tests which must be met by any real science. A physician friend said the same thing about the practice of medicine. He told me that while parts of medicine can be very scientific and meet all of the tests of a science, the practice of medicine itself was an art. As with any art, some people are better at performing it than others.
Where does the scientific method come from?
Contrary to blinding yourself or shutting off your senses, the Socratic method induces a state of questioning things in order to burn off the deadwood, and arrive somewhere closer to what is true. In Zetetic Philosophy, the application of questioning backs the false into a corner by a series of Socratic questions. It seeks, it unmasks, and it provides testable, observable experiments in order to share with others the results of any given experiment.
Expanded upon by Aristotle’s Philosophy, one would highlight what is observably false, and then eliminate the false from possible agreement toward a seeking to understand the laws of nature. This is an effective method towards generating more acute hypotheses that tend to reach conclusion or consequence, without the hypothesis being a completely random guess. This eliminates from equation what is not true, in order to achieve a not false scientific explanation amidst the remainder of what still has a n>0 chance of being true. This transparent application of the scientific method may reduce problems coming from the public trust toward social institutions and amplify what authorities consider to be a “general scientific consensus”, and it can put to rest anything that does not satisfy as sufficient evidence towards the claim. The experiment must be displayed, transparent, and easily duplicated in order maximize its efficacy, in order to best separate the experiment in question from pseudoscience. We see this every day with engines, culinary arts, paintings, music, geometry, architecture, and so on. However, I do not find any evidence for how anyone could capture and describe any general scientific consensus without reading nearly everything ever analyzed and written, so it all becomes reduced to a simpler question beneath it all: “How do you know that?”
All of the sacrosanct notions that are based on “theory” are only hearsay. At best, all of that which constitutes as “theory” remains in the state of hypothesis, since it is without sufficient experiment or testable conclusion.
Examples of this include “germ theory”, “the speed of light”, “the existence of a virus as a cause of disease”, “global warming”, “Bohr’s atomic model”, “atomic weapons”, “climate change”, “the law of gravitation”, “paleontology”, “government”, “space travel”, “corporation” and so on.
The scientific method has been abandoned by the scientific community, and it has been fragmented by the excessively baseless conclusions which over-complicate it by the ideological destruction of accessible or testable experiment. Straight to the point, the scientific method is where a theory or opinion / hypothesis is put forward that matches what we observe in the laws of nature.
Everything we were taught in schools should be further questioned.
Section III:
Philanthropy
The modern education system’s philanthropically curated curriculum repeatedly insists to us that dinosaur fossils exist, as modern science seems to unveil these presupposing details as evidence to further support the hypothesis of evolution. However, it’s important here to emphasize the distance between hypothesis and conclusion as experiment itself. Let’s take a look at some examples of the claim as it’s been presented to us.
When visiting dinosaur museums, we are presented with replicas and plaster-cast artistry that surround the replicas. The replicas are copies of what are said to be very fragile and extremely radioactive fossils that are kept behind closed doors, where only paleontologist experts are allowed to examine these radioactive bones.
The periods of time we are given are based on half-life carbon dating, however when met with laws of nature, something is not adding up with regard to the pseudo-scientific anti-methods of half-life carbon dating when met with laws of nature:
There is a scientific law called the Law of Conservation of Mass, discovered by Antoine Lavoisier in 1785. In its most compact form, it states:
Matter is neither created nor destroyed.
In 1842, Julius Robert Mayer discovered the Law of Conservation of Energy. In its most compact form, it is now called the First Law of Thermodynamics:
Energy is neither created nor destroyed.
If matter or energy is neither created nor destroyed, then how can we calculate the age of old stones, fossils, bones and replicas? Are the methods sufficient enough to satisfy this measurement for reality, or is someone just telling us a story they would like for us to hear?
Is the half-life seance of carbon dating enough to satisfy as sufficient evidence to prove that dinosaurs roamed the Earth millions and millions of years ago? In this instance, consider that whenever evolutionary reductionism is frequently filled with insistence, one must seek resonance with substance by simply asking a question such as this:
Would it best benefit us to further ask questions about why dragons make an appearance on the Chinese Zodiac calendar? With the utility of folklore, and before the era of modern science, would these skeletal discoveries have not simply been called dragon bones, or just giant human bones? More people tend to become enthralled with novels that can be found in the fiction section of a bookstore, however we must ask why the subconscious mind is already seemingly so much more interested in what can be found in “fantasy” or “fiction” as opposed to the claimed “non-fiction” or that which is “scientific”.
Our public school textbooks build and insist claims built upon the Darwinist theory of evolution, having an origin story of animals, man, plants, etc. as being sourced from a primordial soup of near-nothingness. A big bang explosion thus hurled burning gas ball suns into spherical rocks held together by gravity, to allow us a shelf stable homeostasis by a cell that evolves into a fish, that evolves into a gestating anthropoid, that eventually crawls out of the water and the one that survives breathing air goes onto evolve into some monkeys. These monkeys would be our ancestors, and somewhere along the way, we encounter massive dinosaur bones from “when they ruled the earth over 66 million years ago.”
Philip E. Johnson wrote:
“Today it is widely assumed that the existence of fossil remains of numerous extinct species necessarily implies evolution, and most people are unaware that Darwin’s most formidable opponents were not clergymen, but fossil experts. In the early nineteenth century the prevailing geological theory was the “catastrophism” advocated by the great French scientist Cuvier, the father of paleontology. Cuvier believed that the geological record showed a pattern of catastrophic events involving mass extinctions, which were followed by periods of creation in which new forms of life appeared without any trace of evolutionary development.”
Given all that is the case, we should then effectively shift the burden of proof toward those who made the claim. Are we absolutely certain that the bones behind the closed doors of paleontologists are indeed radioactive due to an asteroid slamming into the Earth from space 66 million years ago? Without access to see what’s behind the closed doors, how do you know it isn’t just an empty room? Would it then be possible for modern science and evolution to effectively become an ideology if it for some reason forbade this form of taboo questioning?
With a closer and more comprehensive look at what we’ve already seen, we can witness the twists of some general consensus as it performs its very own air bending, catering to the lowest common denominator of thought.
A NASA employee fires a small ball of aluminum into a small pile of sand with a giant custom built gun from inside a laboratory in California. Computer monitors theatrically flicker with chaotic science looking stuff while the major meteor event is simulated on a smaller scale.
Ask yourself: Does this experiment suffice as conclusive evidence that the dinosaurs died off after a massive asteroid strike? Does any of this actually represent reality? Is this proof that it happened?
Are you sure that this is a dinosaur? Is the science settled? Are we not told in dinosaur museums that the bones are still radioactive from a prehistoric asteroid collision? How do we not know that the video above is more clever theatrics in order to simulate proof of a modified scientific method?
Perhaps contending with their non-existence could be a reason for extinction, thus reaching their very own vanishing point... Disappearing from perspective altogether with a simple removal of the cause of the problem.
Eric Dubay wrote:
“The class Dinosauria was originally defined by Sir Richard Owen of the Royal Society and superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. Or, in other words: the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head, coincidentally in the mid 19th century during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work, hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals and then lo and behold, twelve years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandeveer Hayden, during his exploration of the upper Missouri River found “proof” of Owen’s theory. A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct Trachodon dinosaur...”
On the Chinese Zodiac calendar, we clearly see a dragon amidst many other animals that are all real animals.
How many millions of years ago was this picture taken?
Or what about this one?
Catering to the theory of evolution, modern scientific experts may be inclined to tell you that these people must have found another dinosaur, or maybe that a whale with antlers on its head got hurled out of the sea by a massive water tornado in order for it to land in front of this crowd.
It’s perfectly acceptable to lend your eyes over to trusted sources and experts within their respective specialty fields to take a look at these images for you, for your own eyes may be deceiving you.
And how many millions of years ago was this photo taken?
It’s best not to touch the radioactive bones.
Science says touch your nose.
In the book “Aion”, Carl Jung wrote:
And just like that, the science is settled.
“It worked.”
Any “rationalized intellectual” of the modern era will satisfy their constitutions of proof for the existence of dinosaurs from millions and millions of years ago by wielding an exhaustingly boring-to-read peer-reviewed paper taken from some pretentiously gate-kept academic journal written by nameless reductionists; human shields for a materialistic ideology.
Philanthropists of oil companies make such an insistent effort to program us with these stories at such a young age. But why?
John D. Rockefeller on Making Money: Advice and Words of Wisdom on Building and Sharing Wealth:
“I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers”
Our curriculums in school have been in part funded by the same oil tycoons who profit billions from the artificial scarcity surrounding the use of “fossil fuels” in our costly modernist energy systems. Without museums and today’s education system, the supposed carbon-dating of dinosaur fossils continues to remain in the state of hypothesis, as this method could only at best produce results that are inconclusive. Why else would the above image from sciencebuddies.com make room for science to twist and gloss over experiment, in order to support the theory of dinosaurs and the Big Bang Theory? Examples of philanthropists installing these ideas into the education system mainly include the Rockefeller Foundation, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, among many others who all have a high probability of making an appearance on Epstein’s flight logs.
I’ll just let this St. Paul UFC fighter Joel Bauman clue you into what hides in plain sight.
After a fight on TV, UFC fighter Joel Bauman stated:
“…Jimmy Kimmel, viral this!
I fight to eradicate childhood malnutrition from the planet, and until they release the flight logs…
You, the mainstream media, Hollywood…
…are all pedophiles to me.
Eat dick!”
In the education system, a fear of resource depletion subconsciously increases the value of a target commodity, which in this case would be fossil fuels. There exists no experiment whatsoever to prove that dinosaur bones have decayed over millions of years in order to create the oil that is used today to fuel petroleum cars or power up modern electric grids, yet we are pressured and insisted upon to believe exactly this. The stories of dinosaurs becoming extinct millions of years ago, and the fossils of the dinosaur age slowly festering to eventually become the lead producer of modernist oil reserves, then leads the environmentally-sympathetic types to fall into a dialectical confusion, where both points of the argument insist that fossil fuels are real.
It’s also insisted to the public that oil itself can completely dry up, and our phenomena of electricity would instantly reach its end, specifically due to us reaching the end of natural reserves of fossil fuels. “Back to the stone age”, as they often say. With the simulation of scarcity based on this crafted narrative, oil companies can increasingly fund their own environmentalist oppositions, create dead ends of insufficient alternatives, censor and disrupt all forms of free and infinite energy, and use these techniques of compression to then charge any higher prices arbitrarily decided by the oil companies. If oil companies can maintain that power bills and fuel for transport are barely affordable, then the monopoly can override all forms of regulation, and thus protect its own investment. The only thing keeping these prices relatively low is the necessity to stay balanced on an axis of moderate affordability to ensure that the consumer continues to consume the product that they’ve been tricked into becoming satisfied with. The fish bites the worm, but there’s a catch; this agreement between the producer and the consumer is the metastasis of consent itself. The general agreement with consuming these petroleum substances and utility of dirty electricity is exactly what is keeping people asleep to alternative sources of energy that have been a part of this world for centuries upon centuries, before the forced utility of oil.
And that’s why questioning the existence of dinosaurs and fossil fuels is important. It’s simple: our education system and its curriculum are all funded via systems of philanthropy. These philanthropic pursuits are not charity but rather, an investment of ideological indoctrination, and function to have its constituents learn as close to absolutely nothing as possible.
Inverse charity
It goes something like this:
You become invited to my house after a lively interaction, but we barely know one another. I insist you should join us for dinner, and urge you not to be late. You arrive on time, and you’re let in to a majestic dining room, with a massive table loaded with platters of all of your favorite food, and I already made a soundtrack playlist of what I know to be your favorite music already. Red roses surround the dining room, flittered by dances of elegant candlelight. It’s now known that I have studied you, for I have accumulated your data to become the necessary energy transfer in this excessively charitable night. I’ve listened to you intently. You motion initial concern that this extraordinary generosity wasn’t so necessary, “Oh you didn’t have to do this!”
Ah, but I did have to do this, for I then state, “My, my, this is of the goodness of my heart!” And you’re now wedged amidst the chaos of an imbalanced air between us, as I invite you in, and offer to you this monolithic dinner experience in order to satiate your own impulse toward a table full of your favorite food while we listen to your favorite music… Us. Together. Tonight. We dine.
We barely know one another, for we’ve only met occasionally, but it’s very likely that no one has ever been so generous or thoughtful as to willingly do something so excessive like this for you. You now have two choices, and it’s very likely you want to reduce how awkward this is, for you’ve not ever been in need of this type of charity, and you’re not a glutton whatsoever. So if you’re open and honest, like someone who can see traverse the self into a realm Beyond Good and Evil, you’ll decline this surveillance data level acquisition of an extraordinarily generous and excessive offer to exclusively dine with me as we would listen in the background to what I already know to be your very favorite music. Upon principle of how I must have acquired this information, something is absolutely not adding up, as your instinct detects this situation as extremely strange.
But as you initially decline, I become pursuasive and shift our conversation to the level of coercion by responding, “Oh but I’ve put a lot of effort into making this such a perfect night. If you were not to partake in this evening’s events, it may ruin the rest of my night, as my butler and I will be forced to solemnly deconstruct this elegant dining experience…”
But you don’t want that, do you? Of course not, for there’s a solid non-zero chance that I truly put this all together out of the kindness of my heart. I’m urging you to do what is good.
The air fills with tension, as the walls of spiritual consent and limits of the psyche have been conversationally and strategically unmasked through an impulse of rejection. So, you ease into it a little bit, knowing you wouldn’t want to offend the host. The tradeoff of offending my generous offer for sake of blatant rejection might be considered rude, and so the incentive structure of our discourses realign toward my desires.
We have arrived to a new level of negotiation where you become less likely to reject my surprise offer. You have a smaller and smaller crevice for escape, for you have very little evil integrated in your heart. You timidly respond, “Alright, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt here. The available options on the table is like a feast of all my favorite food, ranging from heavily herbed Italian pizza to grilled swordfish and polenta. You even found my favorite type of hors d'oeuvres: endive boats of five spice lamb and mirepoix, and a large dish of peppered oysters with pre-cut lemons.”
You see, dear guest, that my butler is just so excellent at getting these dishes here on the dot. Gasping, you exhale, “and the dessert has options between a triple chocolate mousse, Turkish delights, and a delicate berry cream tart. How did you know? But also, how lovely it would be to forget my apprehensions and just partake with it tonight. And, oh my, what an incredible song… Beethoven’s Sonata No. 14. Somehow, you just know me.”
Indeed, I do.
Philanthropy and Damage Control
The point here is to encourage the questioning of anything that claims its science to be settled and absolutely correct, and simply utilize that momentum to shift the burden of proof toward those who make the claim by means of shared experiment and open discourse.
Pseudoscientific notions are not testable to the average person, and often forfeit duplicatable experiments, so that the experts can handle it. Frequently, western medicine relies upon monopolistic philanthropists to fund our medical journals, and perpetuate funding for the medical industrial complex via petroleum medicine, and inversions upon the body. If people are lightly poisoned, or are not restored back to full health, sickness becomes profitable. Oil comes from fossils of dinosaurs, right? Take a wild guess where petroleum medicine comes from and who benefits from its production.
Video artist and acrobat archer Shannen Michaela explains this to its sheer extent:
“When it was discovered that drugs could be made from petroleum in the 1900’s, John D. Rockefeller, who at the time controlled 90% of US oil production, seized the opportunity to monetize and take control of the medical industry in a whole new way. Medicines used for thousands of years were now classified as alternative, whereas the new petroleum-based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs became the new norm. Rockefeller began funding top medical schools under the mandate that they only taught allopathic medicine, eventually monopolizing the medical industry in the West. Healing from herbs, plants, and diet were removed from most medical textbooks, and instead the philosophy became ‘a pill for an ill’. Fast-forward to today and I’ll say that modern medicine is amazing for emergencies, but unfortunately our society is sicker than ever with dis-ease at an all time high. And if you follow the money, big pharma really doesn’t seem to have our best interest at heart. You know what they say, ‘a healthy patient is a customer lost’.”
With that established, virology becomes the next thing for questioning as a stealthily fraudulent pseudoscience, given that there is a corrupted equation located directly between the presupposed and installed hypothesis, and the following conclusion carries no independent variables whatsoever. The ontological foundation of virology must present evidence in reality before it is to create something out of nothing from within the wizardry of protecting an investment. Its designated purpose is to weaponize microscopes and railroad dinner table conversations with acceptably tamed talking points, which then produces the narrative’s ripple effect to support the simulated existence of an illusion spell. Virology holds the inverse function to fragment entire civilizations with scare tactics in order to form a medical dictatorship, while simultaneously explaining away the cause of disease as poison or dirty electricity. With use of Pasteur’s Germ Theory, Western medicine can shaft clients on medications that are not designed to solve issues by ensnaring minds with the fear of external particles transferred by contagion, thus shifting strict uniform responsibility on collective numbers of people. Given that its very foundation is false, the end products of Germ Theory are to mask symptoms for the patient, and indeterminate forms of compassionately cruel detention centers AKA “quarantine facilities” per all collective groups of civilian life by their respective governments. Quarantine facilities, concentration camps, or the 15 minute cities of the World Economic Forum; whatever the name, the function is the same: civilian enslavement.
For each major advancement and re-innovation of high powered telescopes (such as the light microscope, electron microscope, and the rife microscope), the definition of virus tends to respectively change, as if it’s preconceived notions of contagion are somehow running away from something. This doubling down on virus existence is a terrifying, ego-maniacal, highly insistent pseudoscience with severe materialistic totalitarian consequences for society abroad, due to its absence of foundation or principle which amounts to spiritual devastation and vampiric despair. Germ theory must be rejected by the public as soon as possible, for there are absolutely no benefits to humanity whatsoever toward believing in something so demonstrably false as “germ theory”, given that a virus has never once been proven to be the cause of disease, nor has a virus ever been isolated. So what’s making people sick? Take a hint.
For now, one could only wonder why the Rockefeller Foundation helped put together such a neat package as “Operation Lockstep” back in 2011. Behold and take a closer look at the end products of Germ Theory.
Pivoting from the long-game of ideological domination, it’s often that we see intellectuals and populists who excessively rationalize, centralize and thus maintain totalitarian systems of control. But how exactly is such a mechanistic web accomplished?
Unravel the dialectics: one may be receiving opinions and maligned information directly from the controlled opposition.
“The Formula has infinite depth in it’s efficacy and application, but it is staggeringly simple, and completely consistent.”
The stories told to us about dinosaurs having roamed the Earth millions of years ago and the fossil fuels that were accidentally created from their flammable and decadent liquid bones have now reached their very own vanishing point, disappearing from this reality, as it’s illusion fades. This vanishing point is somewhere directly behind the closed doors of museums, from where the highly radioactive dinosaur bones are kept away from the field of vision altogether. Safety first!
A solution becomes a simple removal of the cause of the problem. Viruses, dinosaurs, asteroids, shall also go the way of the dinosaurs… Back into their own vanishing point of fantasy, as the fragments are puzzle pieces to peel another layer of the mind’s onion in order to allow what’s true to simply remain.
-Ira James Rogers
End of Vanishing Point I
Preface
Material Splinter
ζητέω
ζητέω Pt. I Philanthropy
Up next:
also my full length film is available now, see below.
In the works:
The Formula: Section II
and…
Vanishing Point III (eBook)
Vanishing Point IV (eBook)
A closing message to the reader and general audience…
Become a free subscriber to keep up with events and new sections.
Paid substack subscriptions optional, and come with perks such as reading new things early.
Or, if you enjoyed reading this and want to “Buy Me A Coffee”, the efforts will be directed toward publishing physical material such as books and DVD’s.
Note that the power of suggestion is key, so please spread this work around as you choose.
Regarding terrain theory, I was recently interviewed on Excelsior! Podcast, and it was a great time.
Another great interview with me can be found here, where I appear as a guest on the Unearthing 5d Reality podcast, hosted by Kaleb and Derek.
Vanishing Point: Section I (eBook)