Previously…
Famous for being both blind and deaf and gaining intelligence via braille hand techniques, Helen Keller spoke in a British accent in front of an audience:
“Inz a zwan blanzd e mis, naga blen mish, dap blueroni maga caca otherin. Ent iz di etleiode dat hand palmed lens if dar ven en this edible is really starting to kick leeeeeh. Nah imabledably, adaban ho una twirly wood el maid hagbengden beflangenit hag onomenowe aplangalang mow a chewy gooey spæesh. Mael, abagandudün tarrow hmalngit hadya ongo aaannnnuuuhhhgh, undu splat londy loodo forreri screap. Unawhaha twi ag splen dydink a biba, korran kwal ban du bolk, anz emtipin aplasty an oaf.”
During a Science Friday interview aired on National Public Radio, filmmaker Werner Herzog stated:
“Our place in the universe… Well, it is here, and that's the place we have, and nothing else; everything else is unfriendly. We cannot flee from our planet, I mean, go to any other planet in the solar system; it's just not inviting. The next star out there is only four and a half light years away, but with the fastest speed we can ever reach… So far, it would take a hundred and ten thousand years just to go there. Hundreds and hundreds of generations, they wouldn't even know where they were going. There would be incest and madness and murder and whatever en route… So, it's not pleasant to move.”
Experiments of False Experience
ζητέω (zētéō) – properly, to seek by inquiring; to investigate to reach a binding (terminal) resolution; to search, "getting to the bottom of a matter."
“IF there is anything on earth like progress, Science will some day have to give up, nolens volens, such monstrous ideas as her physical, self-guiding laws -- void of soul and Spirit, -- and then turn to the occult teachings.”
-Helena Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine (1888)
Before acquiring a talking wheelchair, Professor Stephen Hawking, Ph.D theoretical physics wisely stated:
“Nggggghhhhhuuuuuhhhnnn rrrreeenmenmen eeeennno me. Omnowiwomnewu aaalllwrhegn ma hie.”
Hailed for its often reliable utility in physics and engineering, the scientific method can be used to diagnose problems only to solve them by a purely deductive means. Those who properly employ the scientific method with simplicity are more apt to transparently induce conclusions for any properly conducted experiment by empirical means of disproving positive claims which are false, by the simple removal of that which it is not. When anyone is truthfully extrapolating any real-world experiment toward attentive observers, consistently congruent conclusions reliably form foundational principles in physics and engineering for any society to effectively operate upon. If the experiment is testable, repeatable and observable, the public trust with regard to such an experiment can be positively amplified from within our shared reality, and even more so if the repeatability of it is affordably accessible to those who may come from outside their own respective specialty fields, in order to extract value for themselves.
An ethical philosophical grounding can be a key component in applying guidance to the subjective mind of any scientist, for this social responsibility involves truthful transparency of the method, and shouldn’t fear investigation or questioning. Any ethically charged individual should ideally use the scientific method without bending the experiment, if it is to be a true science. Without the application for this standard of ethics or scientific discernment, parasitic scam artists shall inevitably emerge, producing minor to major consequences while working against the favor of susceptible individuals. Ideologically motivated pseudo-science causes immeasurable problems, and inevitably casts a broad negative effect upon the shared reality of entire civilizations. A more philosophical society allows space for inquiry by allowing subjective discourses and inviting expositional resolution in order to facilitate the achievement of any given objective. In contrast, a more ideologically motivated or totalitarian society tends to willfully ignore or egoistically engage in censorship in order to preserve the image of authority. Authentic individuals are eager to shift hypotheses by allowing any natural phenomenon the opportunity to speak for itself. For any scientist to truthfully communicate those results is mostly useful, however it is due to the opportunities of economic vampirism that scientific corruption exists not too far below the fragile thin ice of the scientific ideal. Skewed experiments are often designed to distort experience by unconsciously de-centering trustees into pervasive forms of psychically destructive hypnotism.
Like a hammer or a box cutter, computer systems are also tools that can be used for building or destroying things, depending upon the extrapolated application of the one interacting with it. More ethical scientists should refrain from the excessive uses of result manipulation from within the interfaces of ever-evolving software, for it holds the potential of becoming a psychically destructive art-form. With moderation, software can still be a useful tool for assisting data collection and measurement, and shouldn’t be completely avoided. The involvement of black mirrored devices would require individuated discernment, thus rendering results into the realms of subjective interpretation and cognitive bias; some see a photo where others who look deeper may counter-claim the photo to be a wizard’s cartoon.
Pseudo-scientific normalizations are often found in the animated presentations of evidences within software or in the proselytizing of chaotic conclusions of nuclear scientists who can be found filming controlled demolitions on realistic looking toy sets from inside some filmmaker’s garage; this scam produces fear-mongering negative effects on eagerly duped observers. While having preprogrammed the public for decades with false doomsday scenarios, rotten politicians are itching to play nuke volleyball war games against foreign adversaries, where both sides of the artificial conflict are weaponizing mushroom cloud imagery. Then arose a nightmarish hyperreality strategically beamed straight into the minds of Cold War generations of people who were all stuck watching low-resolution television sets without rewind buttons, effectively reducing pragmatic skepticism.
The vile rhetoric surrounding these existentially dreadful stunts darkly pivoted the chaotic simulacrum of these artistic renditions into accepting a more restorative order of tighter economic squeezes for civilian life led astray by this mentally enslaving spell. In order to generate subtle increases of income-taxable forms of deliberate punch-down economic sorcery, the gone-in-a-flash hostage situation of nuclear scares would simulate justifications for the very existence of taxation itself, directly benefiting any co-opting superpower involved. By the uses of exaggerated smoke and mirrors through controlled multi-kiloton TNT demolition test explosions, lying statesmen directly threaten their own people by artificially insisting that a grand total of one particular device that is about the size of a briefcase or a car holds the destructive potential to be dumped out of the back of an airplane and indiscriminately obliterate the existence of all life and matter within it’s blast radius. However, if this indiscriminately destructive atomic weapon indeed existed and cleared the city of Hiroshima from its blast radius, then how is it that can we find interviews with survivors? Considering the absence of aerial photography proving a circular blast radius over the targets, the entire situation can only possibly make sense if the city was strategically firebombed. The same applies to Nagasaki, Japan.
And I know what you’re thinking… “What about the nuclear radiation fallout and extremely obscene birth defects?”
We are often told about deformed people and birth defects caused by the effects of radioactive nuclear fallout from atomic weapons or nuclear reactors gone haywire. During a bingo hall interview with Vice called “Atomic Soldiers”, the “atomic veteran” Douglas Hern speaks of having witnessed five nuclear detonations, thus one day in the future, causing his 11 year old daughter to grow a hump on her back, grow hair all over her body, in which he claimed that he and his wife used to shave her twice a day.
In the long-running AMC show, “The Walking Dead”, every episode faces our characters with these ghoulish obstacles: walkers. Behind the scenes, highly talented make-up artists dress up the walkers, as they are actually fully-alive actors who are masked by monstrous make-up, with fake blood and guts, thus effectively simulating the effect of the walking dead, and making the show that much more fun to watch.
How do we know that Douglas Hern’s claim is real? We are not shown any evidence for this claim, but our emotions for the story told may likely impede our investigative query toward questioning whether or not he is even telling the truth. For many of these “atomic veterans” we are told that they were sworn to secrecy for more than 50 years after the weapons tests, and that only now, in this bingo hall can we finally get some stolen valor insight from these goofy freemasons.
When seeing deformed humans in pictures, how can we be certain that this is not an artificial rendering in order to further validate the simulation of nuclear weapons? This effect can be simulated in movies, why wouldn’t they fake it in the perceived reality as well? I can agree that any amount of firebombing or any material weapon could easily be the culprit for severe injury, however there exists no direct evidence of this having been caused by nuclear weapons.
A dialectic occurs with an artificial problem, justifying a nonsensical solution of paying taxes to governments. If nation A claims to have nuclear weapons which can protect it’s people by countering the nuclear weapons stocked up by nation B, in which nation B claims to have nuclear weapons to protect it’s people from the nuclear weapons held by nation A or nations C, D and so on, then that high-stakes situation stifles all these nations into what seems to be a stalemate, such as seen in the Cold War. Like a completely locked up midgame in chess, these rockets that could blow apart entire cities with a single hit are claimed to have been kept shelf stable inside of secret nuclear silos, atomic submarines, aircraft carriers, and so on. This protection racket purported by all nations operates as a justification for the taxation of their own respective populations.
Either they have the nukes or they do not have the nukes.
How would one know for a fact that any of these nations have a single nuclear weapon? Did Douglas Hern really shave his daughter twice a day?
Volatile bluffs of elaborate illusion magic is of absolute benefit to con artists. For example: a poker player holding a 2 of clubs and a 7 of hearts has absolutely nothing matching on the table, but bravely drops a larger than usual stack of chips for the river card. The river now displays a third spade on the table, tricking the active players into believing the raise may represent an unbeatable flush. Holding a pair that would otherwise win the round, the opposing player fears the possible outcome, and capitulates. He folds his cards while the bluffing poker player collects the pot without having to ever reveal his cards.
This metaphor is applicable to the hyperreality of false nuclear weapon scenarios, if only one would simply ask better questions. How did the video camera, the sound equipment, and all captured footage manage to survive from so close within the blast radius while houses were blown apart?
When I was a kid, I used to collect Star Wars Ep. I Pepsi cans (1999), and eventually by the time Star Wars Ep. II came out (2002), I dreadfully discovered that my Star Wars Pepsi can collection had been foolishly shelved for display in the more humid danger zone inside my bedroom. I had underestimated the potential for their automatic demise, as these fragile aluminum soda cans were helplessly slow-cooked in the existential battle against the subtropical climate of western North Carolina. Nature had caused these precious collectible soda cans to leak or explode on the shelf while I was away at school. Deductive reasoning would help me later to conclude that the Star Wars Pepsi cans may have remained intact without explosion, had they been stored away in a more naturally cooled basement area, which was tucked far beneath the vapory chaos of this often-suffocating mist of humidity. But if even we were to presume that at least some of these nuclear weapons are real, then how is it that when North Korea’s military authoritatively wheels out live nuclear weapons onto hot pavement directly in front of the leader and thousands of witnessing civilians, the stunt goes off without any problems, with one very clear example being an existentially destructive radioactive explosion underneath the hot sun? What if an axle breaks and one of these nukes accidentally goes off? What if it’s too humid outside? Could it be that these phallic rockets are just pieces of military art? Why would they need to fake them? If the parade nukes are fake, how far does this theatrical demonstration actually go?
The violent Cold War nuke explosion imagery was briefly flashed into the minds of public school students via television announcements and daunting official radio broadcasts. This dark tactic was a complete rug-pull against the collective psyche by our public education systems. This lowest form of parasitic illusion sorcery actually fleeced generations of students into subconscious agreements, riddling populations with these ghastly mind control games, defaulting the nihilistically traumatized into an unconscious worship by proxy, specifically towards that of destructive nuclear science.
“The majority of men prefer delusion to truth. It soothes. It is easy to grasp. Above all, it fits more snugly than the truth into a universe of false appearances—of complex and irrational phenomena, defectively grasped.”
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist
Trashy realms of obtusely misused art-form simulates to any susceptible observer a highly insistent system of false reality, rendering the public hopelessly stalemated by an existentially dreadful form of academic mental torture. Public school curriculums coerced students into playing along bi-annual duck-and-cover drill operations, psychically primed by falsely helpful instructions of statist propagandist wizards who made evil reality horror films, remotely instructing the schools about how to barely survive any spontaneous extinction event threats. Bullshitting red telephones rested on the desks of traitorous political leaders in order to play fake war games of artificial nuclear volleyball. School prisoner students were coerced into regularly repeating these needlessly traumatizing drills of what produced undeserved hopelessness via the artificial futility of ridiculously staged duck and cover operations. Intoxicating imagery of the nuclear hoax was flash-permeated into the fragile memories of susceptible children, so to have them accept a philosophy of total nihilism, serving an inverse function facilitated by a mass de-centering.
The existence of nuclear weapons is a positive claim made by world superpowers, but the false imagery errs heavily toward their non-existence.
Improvisational actors don the white-collared costumes of Modern Science™ while being briefly interviewed on condescending television channels. These philanthropy-funded parasites can be found littering cartoon-fueled trash all over the textbooks and newspapers of the scientific realm. By use of fake software evidences, which permeate obnoxious fire-hoops for solving false problems among the psychic realm, the susceptible public grows terrified beyond necessity, and thus capitulates to the spell being cast on tell-a-vision. False solutions arise to solve false problems, which often benefit parasitic secret societies who intentionally perpetuate ghastly hoaxes in order to artificially react to the dialectical issue at hand, thus successfully feeding off a host population. With a proper fear ritual surrounding false evidence, those who benefit from selling products that ameliorate initial scientific fears are often found to congruently be the very same philanthropists who directly funded the very same pseudo-scientific “experiments” that generated such distorted simulacrums of false issues, which is hermetically crafted into real life consequences, intentionally cast upon our shared reality.
An Experience of False Experiments.
“We are the bastard children of a nation whose dreams have died
Everything that we believed in, it all turned out to be a lie
And change seems oh so difficult, acceptance is the common voice
Powerless against their power
We act like we don't have a choice
Weapons of mass deception
Fear is the greatest weapon
Used to maintain their control
Cause the scared do what they're told
Dangers lurking in every corner, minds clouded with mistrust
New witches for them to burn, smoke covers the bloodlust
False fears installed in masses, so real issues go ignored
Like a phoenix rising from the ashes
Total power is their reward
Control through fear
A reign of terror is here
Control through fear
The terrors powers made clear
The end is near”-The Unseen, State of Discontent (2005)
“Six feet. Stay at home. Save lives. Wash your hands. Wear a mask. 15 days to slow the spread. It’s proven safe and effective. Children can have heart attacks too. Peer reviewed data cannot lie.”
In other words: A sinister snake oil salesman directly benefits by falsely offering to cure (placebo*) something that doesn’t actually exist (nocebo*), by gaslighting the fearful customer into tacit consent for agreement upon that which doesn’t actually exist (nocebo), when it’s merely the fear itself that has been making them sick. By urgently simulating the necessity for the extraordinarily profitable snake oil (placebo that does nothing), the salesman can manipulate the very emotions of the fearful client by introducing such a fake solution to what would otherwise be a non-existent problem.
Definitions from Oxford Languages:
*placebo- (noun)
a harmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect.
"his Aunt Beatrice had been kept alive on sympathy and placebos for thirty years"
a substance that has no therapeutic effect, used as a control in testing new drugs.
a measure designed merely to calm or please someone.
"pacified by the placebos of the previous year, they claimed a moral victory"
*nocebo- (noun)
a detrimental effect on health produced by psychological or psychosomatic factors such as negative expectations of treatment or prognosis.
“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called”
1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV)
Modern claims made about the scientific method arise from asking a simple question into the technocracy’s search engine. In plain writing from the top of a corporatized algorithm, highly ideological pseudo-scientific agendas receive excuses to exist, which bends the scientific method itself, xeroxing the academic field of science into an egoistic circus.
Sciencebuddies.com writes:
Skewed apart from its methodology, it is clear that much of what we perceive to be conclusive scientific evidence skips the experiment altogether, as can be seen in the first sentence of the major paragraph:
“Do all scientists follow the scientific method exactly? No. Some areas of science can be more easily tested than others. For example, scientists studying how stars change as they age or how dinosaurs digested their food cannot fast-forward a star’s life by a million years or run medical exams on feeding dinosaurs to test their hypotheses.”
“Meanwhile, in our days, Scientists are more self-opinionated and bigoted than even the clergy. For they minister to, if they do not actually worship.”
-Helena Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine (1888)
The problem reveals itself with clues laced out in the words themselves, where we hear talk of “scientific theory” as opposed to “conclusion” or “experiment”. In order to unravel nefarious motives which produce pseudo-scientific trash, what necessitates questioning are the ideological presuppositions lurking in the conspiratorial minds of benefactors who wave flags for a broadly-accepted Modern Science™.
In 1895, Theosophist C.W. Leadbeater wrote in his book “The Astral Plane”:
“Most works dealing with Mysticism and Occultism are characterised by the lack of a scientific presentation, such as is exacted in every department of science. They give us far more the significance of things, rather than descriptions of the things themselves.”
Often wielding condescending explanations without demonstrable evidence comes the hyper-conclusive pseudoscientist, whose artificial science substitutes mere insistence and deadened empty space in place of any functional experiment in reality. Without any observable substance to experiment upon, that absence itself is what renders this particular misuse of the scientific method back into the lines of questioning.
In his 1897 book “The Will to Believe”, philosopher and psychologist William James wrote:
“Our next duty, having recognized this mixed-up state of affairs, is to ask whether it be simply reprehensible and pathological, or whether, on the contrary, we must create it as a normal element in making up our minds. The thesis I defend is, briefly stated this: Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot by its nature be decided on intellectual grounds; for to say, under such circumstances, ‘Do not decide, but leave the question open,’ is itself a passional decision, — just like deciding yes or no, — and is attended with the same risk of losing the truth. The thesis thus abstractly expressed will, I trust, soon become quite clear.
The reliance upon computer models, trusting experts in respective specialty fields, and overriding one’s own ability to test these experiments for themselves is exactly what shifts the fields of science into the territories of pseudoscience, or scientism. A modern celebrity astrophysicist such as Neil DeGrasse Tyson is openly insisting that the 5 senses (sight, smell, taste, touch, hearing) are not useful data collectors for one to conduct science for themselves.
During a lecture, astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson said:
“One of the lowest forms of evidence is eyewitness testimony. Which is odd because it’s one of the highest forms of evidence in the court of law, which disturbs me greatly.
If you come from a lab to a science conference and say, ‘This is true’…
…We say, ‘How do you know this?’
‘Because I saw it.’
That’s really the end of your talk, and you just leave…
And then we say, ‘Come back when you have a chart recorder, to just give me something that does not have to flow through your senses.’
…Because your senses is some of the worst data-taking devices that exist, and science did not achieve maturity until we had instruments that either extended our senses or replaced them.”
Though we may entertain this line of thought, the inverse function of this steers any science-trusting mind further towards an ultra-efficient worship of data. Science simulates an endless process often producing end products of even more ideas, while on the contrary, engineering utilizes this method as a tool to produce end products that exist in reality, which is useful. Sharing information to other subjects usually results in someone using video recording devices, and trying to provide more scrupulous evidences to support their case with context and transparency. Perhaps the person saw it and also gathered a recording of it with a handy video camera. This could easily replicate the two senses of sight and sound, something of which chart recorders themselves cannot ever make a proper substitution for. Security cameras can be used to identify and catch criminals, and video recordings can help find the truth of a crime, while chart recorders may detect cultural patterns in order to assist corporations to manipulate trends with control groups. Ironically, all possibilities of getting closer to cosmological truth is quickly shooed away and conveniently overlooked by Neil DeGrasse Tyson, who has openly claimed that he refuses to ever debate anyone who disagrees with his chosen cosmological model, while the opposing side has clearly shown willingness to discuss this openly.
During his “Negation of the Real” speech, author James Lindsay stated:
“It’s called ‘negating the real’
…we need to obliterate reality if we're going to substitute in a fake. There's no other way to get people to accept a fake reality; you have the power of your own senses. What do we always say when we want to point out a totalitarian thing?
‘Don't believe your lying eyes’
‘Don't believe your lying ears’
‘Don't believe your own senses.’
Your senses actually allow you to contact truth.
If you're a Christian, you believe the law is written on your heart; it allows you to contact truth.
Theyhave to obliterate that.
Theyhave to negate your access to the real in order to substitute the hyperreal in its place.Theycan't give you the artificial unless they get rid of the actual for you, and that's very important to understand.”
For any independent thinker who carries an inner dialogue, the subjective hallucinatory experience traverses into levels of reflective interpolation, lucidly daydreaming far beyond the widely-accepted limitations as defined by schools of thought which enshroud us with the ego boundaries of applied physics and starkly unmoved empirical sciences. This revolutionary act of self discovery begins with the entranced becoming more open to the possibility of breaching past the ego’s simulated boundaries, in order to discover one’s own divine inner world. Similar to the wi-fi nodes that induce a wireless state of connectivity via Ethernet, the collective unconscious is accessed by psychically esoteric means, where it’s layers can be observed for oneself through acts of transcendental meditation, mirror and candle work, or by ingesting balanced amounts of mycelium, vast arrays of alchemical potions, acacia root bark extractions, burning spirits, etc. sourced from nature as closely as possible.
(However, one must always bear in mind the expansive mycological studies of that which may be potentially poisonous, so not to accidentally create damage with any unnecessary sickness that could have otherwise been averted by fruitful research.)
In 1964, mystic astrologer Manly P. Hall wrote in his book “Paracelsus: His Mystical and Medical Philosophy”:
“Paracelsus held that true knowledge is attained in two ways, or rather that the pursuit of knowledge is advanced by a two-fold method, the elements of which are completely interdependent. In our present terminology, we can say that these two parts of method are intuition and experience. To Paracelsus, these could never be divided from each other.
The purpose of intuition is to reveal certain basic ideas which must then be tested and proven by experience. Experience, in turn, not only justifies intuition, but contributes certain additional knowledge by which the impulse to further growth is strengthened and developed. Paracelsus regarded the separation of intuition and experience to be a disaster, leading inevitably to greater error and further disaster. Intuition without experience allows the mind to fall into an abyss of speculation without adequate censorship by practical means. Experience without intuition could never be fruitful because fruitfulness comes not merely from the doing of things, but from the overtones which stimulate creative thought. Further, experience is meaningless unless there is within man the power capable of evaluating happenings and occurrences. The absence of this evaluating factor allows the individual to pass through many kinds of experiences, either misinterpreting them or not interpreting them at all. So Paracelsus attempted to explain intuition and how man is able to apprehend that which is not obvious or apparent. Is it possible to prove beyond doubt that the human being is capable of an inward realization of truths or facts without the assistance of the so-called rational faculty?”
This transcendent experience within makes way for theosophical traditions to effectively supersede the scientific method of gathering data, and instead extrapolate them through philosophy and weirding arts, which leans more heavily upon a balanced mix of divine intuition influenced by spiritually-charged psychedelic experiences. Upon having integrated the psychic shadow, open-minded souls may have the opportunity to enter into ascendant mental states beyond physicality. By way of intentionally transcending the five senses as a conduit towards extra-sensory perception, one may gain deeper accesses into the subconscious mind. These layers of the psyche exist in dream-like realms, much like peeling an onion to reveal a thin film, occluding another layer of onion beneath it. A metaphorical knob-turning of psychic frequency occurs within the transcendent mental realms, as it patiently awaits beyond words and thoughts. For failing to ever ask better questions, atheistic empiricists deny themselves access to these spiritual realms, for sake of fictionalizing the fifth element of æther, and worshiping the fact-checked pseudo-reality as an insufficient higher power, generating a seemingly unreachable itch of perpetual anxiety. They fail to observe the magical entertainer who learned how to pull rabbits out of hats.
In an intentionally de-centered state, vulnerability emerges, and the mind of the subject enters into a more supernatural flow-state. When properly managed by any well-guarded practitioner, this altered state of consciousness can be useful for explorations that go above and beyond the material state of existence.
Astral projection begins by exiting the experience of physical sensation.
The mage Draja Mickaharic wrote:
“Our shared perception of the physical universe by our sensory organs is all that we really have in common with our fellow human beings. Most of us eventually recognize that many of our perceptions, and the experiences resulting from these perceptions, are so unique to us that we cannot really share them with others.
While a majority can agree on observations such as dimension (length, height, breadth), color, and sound, our standards of odor and taste have a great variability, and this makes any observations of these physical senses quite subjective. The more subtle senses— the psychic perceptions— show even greater ranges of variability. Many people seem to be blind, deaf, and dumb to these phenomena, while others have psychic senses as open to these non-physical perceptions as their physical senses are open to physical perceptions.”
Some highly restrictive beliefs of more reductionist academics tend to be existentially nihilistic and egoistically impenetrable, often due to the omissive nature of the curriculums sold to them. The extremely coercive academic system introduces any youthful person into the processes of becoming immeasurably indebted with student loans, for the hearsay threat of eventually experiencing catastrophic economic failure. Once someone is near leaving high school, a constant sales chop is fed to teenagers about how leaping forward into universities, and moving far away into some prison-like dorm-room serves as such a good investment for increasing one’s chance of becoming a dream job employee for some far-in-the-future career. With a closer look at how this system operates, it reeks more like a hostage situation, while deeply indebted students spend extreme amounts of time remaining unknowingly enslaved by getting duped into these rat races of incessantly torturous bullshit homework, which mostly serves to vet them for hyper-analytical credences.
Due to this stringent system of forced learning, many seem disabled from unlearning any mental trash fed to them. Spellbound students often mimic general agreement with the heavily-ingrained false knowledge borrowed from spellbound professors, for sake of protecting such a vastly time-consuming investment. Great numbers of people accept the material status quo and go about their daily lives without knowledgeable preparation or spiritual protection ritual, rendering them susceptible toward the will of authoritarian control, and rendering their life-force into low vibrational states of ripe food for otherworldly energy vampires. Without having ever experienced psychoanalytical shadow work, one could find nothing to worship in a higher power except for the simulated flames of an asteroid that will never arrive. Mentally de-centered subjects may then become malleable avatars for psychical manipulation by the spell-casting of a more nefarious hypnotist or ideologically-possessed being. The top-down academic hubris of materialistic totalitarian sorcery, serves to rigidly enforce reductionist visions, thus enslaving minds to operate on more restrictive modes.
Experiments of false experience.
Draja Mickaharic wrote:
Both modern and ancient investigations of the manner of perception, and the operation of the human sensory system, reveal that the physical senses and their interpretation are ultimately subjective. They are particular to the individual, rather than objective, and can not always be agreed on by the community. Anthropological research has indicated that physical perception by our sensory organs may be culturally subjective as well, and really not uniform through the human family as a whole. For the majority of humanity, the perceptions of the non-measurable physical, as well as the non-physical senses, are entirely subjective. These perceptions are based upon references which the individual does not share with family or community.
When we classify various modes of magical practice, it will necessarily be subjective and will relate to individual perceptions. The practice of magic is seldom objective, and is seldom examined objectively by the community. The practice of magic is usually a subjective and personal experience.
Magic will never become a science because it is not measurable, nor can it be precisely replicated. These are the two tests which must be met by any real science. A physician friend said the same thing about the practice of medicine. He told me that while parts of medicine can be very scientific and meet all of the tests of a science, the practice of medicine itself was an art. As with any art, some people are better at performing it than others.
Where does the scientific method come from?
Contrary to blinding yourself or shutting off your senses, the Socratic method induces a state of questioning things in order to burn off the deadwood, and arrive somewhere closer to what is true. In Zetetic Philosophy, the application of questioning backs the false into a corner by a series of Socratic questions. It seeks, it unmasks, and it provides testable, observable experiments in order to share with others the results of any given experiment.
Looking back to the Greeks, Plato is our main source to know directly of Socrates’ existence, and for this Socrates character to question things into oblivion, ironically failed to write anything. Perhaps he was just running around asking questions until people just wanted to kill him, or… Whatever here’s a question.
Why did Bruce Wayne turn himself into Batman?
Expanded upon by Aristotle’s Philosophy, one would highlight what is observably false, and then eliminate the false from possible agreement toward seeking to understand the laws of nature. This is an effective method towards generating more acute hypotheses that tend to reach conclusion or consequence, without the hypothesis being a completely random guess. This eliminates from equation what is not true, in order to achieve a not false scientific explanation amidst the remainder of what still has a n>0 chance of being true. This transparent application of the scientific method may reduce problems coming from the public trust toward social institutions and amplify what authorities consider to be a “general scientific consensus”, and it can put to rest anything that does not satisfy as sufficient evidence towards the claim. The experiment must be displayed, transparent, and easily duplicated in order maximize its efficacy, in order to best separate the experiment in question from pseudoscience. We see this every day with engines, culinary arts, paintings, music, geometry, architecture, and so on. However, I do not find any evidence for how anyone could capture and describe any general scientific consensus without reading nearly everything ever analyzed and written, so it all becomes reduced to a simpler question beneath it all: “How do you know that?”
Within the scientific framework, all of the sacrosanct notions that are based on “theory” are only hearsay. At best, all of that which constitutes as “theory” remains in the state of hypothesis, since it is without a testable experiment or sufficient conclusion.
Examples of this include “germ theory”, “the speed of light”, “the existence of a virus as a cause of disease”, “global warming”, “Bohr’s atomic model”, “atomic weapons”, “climate change”, “the law of gravitation”, “paleontology”, “government”, “space travel”, “corporation”, “pediatricians”, random excuses appealing to a “general consensus” and so on.
The scientific method has been abandoned by the scientific community, and it has been fragmented by the excessively baseless conclusions which over-complicate it by the ideological destruction of accessible or testable experiment. Straight to the point, the scientific method is where a theory or opinion / hypothesis is put forward that matches what we observe in the laws of nature.
Everything we were ever taught in public schools should be further questioned.
-In Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back, a dialogue occurs in regard to “using the force”.
Yoda: “Always with you, what cannot be done. Here you nothing that I say?
Luke Skywalker: “Master, moving stones around is one thing, but this is totally different!”
Yoda: “No! No different. Only different in your mind.
You must unlearn what you have learned.”
Luke: “Alright, I’ll give it a try.”
Yoda: “No. Try not. Do or do not. There is no try.”
“I think any reasonable person can conclude that the redemption of the world, if it’s to be achieved, can only be achieved through magic. It’s too late for science. It’s too late for hoity-toity politics.”
-Terrence McKenna on Alchemy and the Hermetic Corpus (1991)
Eric Dubay wrote:
“There is definitely depleted uranium being used in non-nuclear weapons in the middle-east and these have indeed caused birth defects etc. and are highly radioactive. I was watching something about how the use of depleted uranium has completely made tank warfare obsolete because one hand-held depleted uranium round can eat through the tanks then asphyxiate and burn everyone inside as it incinerates and instantly uses up all the oxygen. Nuclear chain reactions have never been shown to exist, all the nuke test footage is fake, the Hiroshima/Nagasaki footage is spliced, vegetation started growing immediately and it is a thriving city now. No thousands of years of radiation, no birth defects. The areas had clearly been fire-bombed and were not the result of single centralized explosions. The military certainly has devastating weapons of mass destruction, but they are not "nuclear" and their use would not result in the Hollywood super-radioactive fall-out apocalypse - that is all just fear porn.”
Nuclear weapons do not exist.
-Ira James Rogers
Vanishing Point I
Ascension Prevention
Splinter
Experiments of False Experience
Philanthropy
This article is chapter 3 of my book, soon to be released in physical form.
Support my work with options listed below, or by simply sharing this around with your friends. Any form of support helps.
Digital tip jar, support my work:
Cashapp: $irarogers
Venmo: @Ira-Rogers-1
Find more of my works here:
discography, articles, films, etc: Linktree
Substack, films + articles/ebook, free and paid subscriptions optional: proxyearth.substack.com
When you get a movie night, check out my new film “Vanishing Point”. I even gave it smoke breaks; 3 films w/ 2 intermissions.
“The Formula has infinite depth in it’s efficacy and application, but it is staggeringly simple, and completely consistent.”
(Preview of next chapter)
Philanthropy
The modern education system’s philanthropically curated curriculum repeatedly insists to us that dinosaur fossils exist, as modern science seems to unveil these presupposing details as evidence to further support the hypothesis of evolution. However, it’s important here to emphasize the distance between hypothesis and conclusion as experiment itself. Let’s take a look at some examples of the claim as it’s been presented to us.
When visiting dinosaur museums, we are presented with replicas and plaster-cast artistry that surround the replicas. The replicas are copies of what are said to be very fragile and extremely radioactive fossils that are kept behind closed doors, where only paleontologist experts are allowed to examine these radioactive bones.
The periods of time we are given are based on half-life carbon dating, however when met with laws of nature, something is not adding up with regard to the pseudo-scientific anti-methods of half-life carbon dating when met with laws of nature:
There is a scientific law called the Law of Conservation of Mass, discovered by Antoine Lavoisier in 1785. In its most compact form, it states:
Matter is neither created nor destroyed.
In 1842, Julius Robert Mayer discovered the Law of Conservation of Energy. In its most compact form, it is now called the First Law of Thermodynamics:
Energy is neither created nor destroyed.
If matter or energy is neither created nor destroyed, then how can we calculate the age of old stones, fossils, bones and replicas? Are the methods sufficient enough to satisfy this measurement for reality, or is someone just telling us a story they would like for us to hear?
02: Splinter
The higher power of unreadable peer reviewed toilet paper trash serves as a pretentiously hyper-analytical icon for the ideology of Modern Science™
Share this post